RealClearSports
Advertisement
Hugh Esling - October 21, 2014

Should we hate cyclists or merely abhor them?

You see them everywhere, cycling to and from work, miles each way. It’s a mission for them. Financially it’s not necessary they do this because bike equipment is costlier than divorce, but something impels these folks to bicycle through sleet, snow, and yes, some sun, festooned in lights strong enough to start their own laser-show troupe group.

Here’s a scoop: no cyclist likes to be passed by another cyclist. Ever. It’s irrational because as cyclists readily admit, each rider rides differently weighted and geared bikes, and cyclists range from the shape of donuts - soft as whipped cream, to the shape of string beans - hard as nails. 

But once a cyclist gets into the car (when hell freezes over, or the bike is in the shop after being pranged by a car) a transformation more powerful than religious conversion occurs: a car-driver mentality immediately takes over and all cyclists are instantaneously deemed as vermin to be road killed.

And by any stretch of the imagination, the stretched bicycle shorts are not a good look. (And at around $100 they might not be a good buy.) If we wanted to see your particulars, your units, your junk – we would have joined airport security. Keep the aerobic pornographic bib shorts where they belong: in an old dusty dresser in an older musty attic. If you must share, picture the panties on your YouTube channel or Facebook page.

On the subject of aerobics, how healthy is cycling, breathing in all that car and truck exhaust, not to... read more »

Sheldon Hirsch - October 16, 2014

The recent series of shameful episodes involving NFL players prompted renewed speculation that on-field head trauma contributes to off-field violence. Bob Costas added a wrinkle, pointing out that when out-of-control NFL player Greg Hardy threw a woman onto a couch, she landed on a variety of shotguns and assault weapons. With other gun-related incidents in mind (for example, Jovan Belcher’s murder/suicide; Dave Duerson’s and Junior Seau’s suicides; Aaron Hernandez’s murder charge, and more), Costas suggested that the NFL worry about guns.

(Costas' 2012 rant on gun violence)

Let’s review the evidence.

A recent study pursuant to the NFL’s concussion suit suggested that nearly 30 percent of NFL players eventually develop significant brain damage, widely attributed to head trauma suffered on the field. 

Pathologists commonly find unusual tangles of tau protein in the brains of NFL players at autopsies. The tau protein allegedly forms the link between head trauma and the impaired cognition and other clinical features characteristic of a syndrome called chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). 

Both direct and countrecoup (when the brain bounces off the skull opposite the initial contact site) impact may damage the frontal lobe. This area does not fully develop in males... read more »

Sheldon Hirsch - October 11, 2014

I’ve had zero sympathy for Adrian Peterson and the defense of his alleged child beating. Reasonable people practice tolerance of other cultures but cultural differences do not justify all behavior. "The way we've always done it" does not constitute a reasoned argument in the face of common sense and modern thinking.

On the other hand, Peterson deserves fair and rational treatment from the legal system.

We just learned that prosecutor Brett Ligon filed a motion asking to jail Peterson for violating the terms of his bond. The prosecutor's office wrote, apparently with a straight face, "The state argues that the defendant has smoked marijuana while on bond." Marijuana remains an illegal drug in Texas, so by the letter of the law, Peterson violated his bond provisions.

The jail request violates decency and common sense.

It does the nearly impossible: It makes Adrian Peterson deserving of some sympathy. 

Courts typically deny bail when the accused presents a flight risk or a danger to society. If the state did not previously consider Peterson a flight risk or a danger to society, why worry now? (The County already filed a petition asking to restrict Peterson to supervised visits with his son.) What about marijuana - increasingly legalized; used by many high-functioning people including prosecutors - concerns Mr. Ligon to the extent of asking for incarceration?

The worst part may be that some legal analysts predict that Ligon’s motion will be granted.

I'd prefer a counter-motion for prosecutorial misconduct, if... read more »

Jack Beaman - October 10, 2014

Earlier this week, Houston Texans running back Arian Foster voiced his disdain for Thursday Night Football. His argument was simple: the NFL acts like it cares about player safety, but then turns around and gives players a shorter recovery time between games. 

Concerns have been voiced about TNF for awhile now, but with the league increasingly lambasted over player safety, the playing of weekday games is beginning to take center stage. Simply put, the NFL can't continue to preach player safety when its priorities are clearly all about making as much money as possible. And Thursday Night Football is about big money. CBS is paying the NFL $275 million for this season's eight-game package.

So what’s the NFL’s answer to critics who say the Thursday night contests are putting the health of its players needlessly at risk? The league commissioned an injury study that purports to show that roughly the same amount of injuries take place during Thursday night games as Sunday games.

But the players are talking about something more than high profile, carry-them-off-the-field injuries. They speak of the wear and tear and fatigue that go with less recovery time. The quick turnaround makes a football player's week leading up to the game — the grind that no one really talks about — that much harder. Those days after a game are absolutely brutal, and having three fewer days to heal makes it even worse. As Texans wide receiver Andre Johnson told Sports Illustrated’s Robert Klemko, “I guess because they don’t... read more »